[Offtopic] Re: New Proposed Xconq Web Site Online

[Eric McDonald <mcdonald at phy dot cmich dot edu>]

Jim Kingdon wrote:
> > Fi!  Mia esperantaj lertetoj estas rustaj...
>
> Mi povis kompreni vin!  Kaj vi povas relerni nur per klopodi.

"kaj" -> "and"

"I was able to understand you!" (?)
"And you are able to _____ ____ by/through ____."   (?)

> Eric, la teksto enhavis kelkajn etajn erarojn do ne konfuzighu. 

"ne konfuzighu" -> "Do not confuse" (??)
"la teksto enhavis kelajn erarojn" -> "the text ___ ____ ____ errors" -> 
"the text contained/had a few small errors/mistakes"   (??)
"do ne konfuzighu" -> "that one must not confuse" -> "that one must be 
careful not to make" (??)

> Vi
> pravas pri la akordo inter sustantivo kaj adjektivo ("Ludoj estas
> bonaj").

"You ___ ____ the agreement between subject and adjective ('Games are 
good')".  (?)

I am going to have to figure out "pri"; I have seen it several times now.

Some observations:
(1) I have detected no repeated consonants or vowels thus far.
(2) I have detected no potential diphthongs thus far.
I suppose the language is intended to be lexically simple as well as 
grammatically simple....

Eric