This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Xconq project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Action points



   From: Sami P Perttu <perttu@cc.helsinki.fi>
   Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 16:50:01 +0300 (EET DST)

   Is this an inconsistency in the X11 interface or the acp system, or a
   "feature"?

   If a unit has an acp-min of, say, -100, and I click the left mouse
   button on a distant cell, the unit starts moving there and doesn't stop
   until its acp is -100. But if I move the unit cell by cell from the
   keyboard it won't budge when acp reaches zero. Should there really be
   a difference between the two methods of control?

Hmmm, sounds like a bug, will have to look into it.  The theory is that
a unit with negative acp at the *beginning* of a turn is "tired" and
can't initiate any new actions.  But you're supposed to be able to
drive it negative during the turn, whether the actions come from a
single task (mouse click) or several.

							Stan




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]