This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the systemtap project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hi - On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:43:16PM +0000, Baruch Even wrote: > [...] > It's a bit hard to defend that my measurements are valid when the > overhead is twice than what I'm measuring. Agreed. > I guess it doesn't align with the systemtap group objectives but I'd be > happy to see a static instrumentation tool for the kernel to allow me to > insert the code I need after compilation. Hopefully such a method would > have a lower overhead. Could you explain what you m ean? Inserting code after compilation is normally called dynamic, not static instrumentation. (We are actually interested in supporting static instrumentation in some form.) - FChE
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |