This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com> writes:
> I think things have stablelized now and we can think about 2.3.2. Do
> all architectures which worked in 2.3.1 work now? Are any other
> architectures which didn't work in 2.3.1 close to working with the
> current tree?
x86-64 works and passes the complete testsuite with the exception of
the linuxthreads/ex18 problem that I mentioned on libc-alpha.
But this didn't work in 2.3.1 either, so we're as good as before - and
in most areas we're better ;-).
So, feel free to go ahead.
A prerelease might be a good idea,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj at suse dot de
private aj at arthur dot inka dot de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |