This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 08:52:35AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > It certainly works fine for me, but I am not using the same tools.
>> > I am using GCC 3.2 with RH modifications and binutils is also a RH version.
>>
>> I just tried it with newer binutils (2.12.90.0.15 20020717) and that
>> worked fine. We might need to document the minimal supported binutils
>> version.
>
> Ours is binutils 2.13.90.0.2. Well, we need to find out the oldest
> binutils which worked ok and also write a binutils testcase whcih will
> ensure this will work right from now on.
I can easily test this with my old and broken binutils (2.12.90.0.4
20020408) but so far I didn't fully grab the problem and how a
testcase might look.
> I think it is an useful feature to be able to access a compat-only variable
> (and getting to it through aliases doesn't work because of COPY relocs).
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |