This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: fileops.c:1618: warning: weak declaration of `_IO_do_write'after first use results in unspecified behavior

Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> writes:

> Those warnings have been appearing for a while now (I also see them with
> the RH variant of gcc-3.2), but I was too lazy to look into avoiding them
> until you spurred me.  I was able to get rid of those warnings just by
> reordering the decls in those files.  The weak decls don't need to appear
> before any other decl of the symbol, only before any reference in a
> function or another initializer.

Thanks a lot for fixing those!

>
> Now the only spurious warnings in my build are "declared static but never
> defined" for the things defined in asm and referenced via C decls.  I don't
> know of any way to get rid of those.

We had them for ages and I don't know whether it's possible to fix
those properly at all :-(

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]