This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:
> You might have seen the batch of changes which I added yesterday.
> These sources are mainly Intel's hand-written, optimized, and fairly
> accurate libm for IA-64. I've checked in all the code which already
> works, some files have errors. I'll do accuracy measurements using
> the programs I wrote several years ago once I have a bit of time.
>
> THe other change which went in was a 96bit long double implementation
> of j1. Stephen Moshier is hopefully providing appropriate versions of
> the other missing functions are well (and perhaps 128bit versions).
Excellent!
> But that's not all. I have another giant patch waiting here. It's a
> complete rewrite of quite a lot of math functions contributed by IBM.
> Their guys in Haifa are really today's elite in math library
> implementations. The functions have last bit accuracy, no bit wrong.
> As for the Intel libm integrating this one will be tricky. The
> structure is different from what we expect. I cannot do it right now.
Do you have any documentation about the functions or can you provide
me with the current version of the patches?
> After yesterday's partly incomplete patch things are back to normal
> now. I've successfully compiled the current veriso on x86, IA64,
> Alpha, PPC, and Arm.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |