This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

__iswalnum etc?

To: GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
Subject: __iswalnum etc?
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Date: 28 Dec 2000 10:10:23 +0100


Compiling glibc gives these warnings:
wcfuncs.c:39: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswalnum'
wcfuncs.c:41: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswalpha'
wcfuncs.c:43: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswblank'
wcfuncs.c:45: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswcntrl'
wcfuncs.c:47: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswdigit'
wcfuncs.c:49: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswlower'
wcfuncs.c:51: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswgraph'
wcfuncs.c:53: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswprint'
wcfuncs.c:55: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswpunct'
wcfuncs.c:59: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswupper'
wcfuncs.c:61: warning: no previous prototype for `__iswxdigit'

Why do we need the __iswalnum declarations at all?  Shouldn't we
declare them directly as iswalnum without using aliases?

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]