This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hi,
I do not think that wordexp() is described clearly as
MT-unsafe on the specification.
Wordexp() is not thread safe. Because, wordexp() uses
__setenv() and __unsetenv() internally.
# grep -n setenv ./posix/wordexp.c
857: __unsetenv ("IFS");
1869: __setenv (env, value, 1);
Therefore, if a lot of wordexp() is executed at the same
time, SIGSEGV can be generated.
Example:tst-worexp2.tar.gz
Reference:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4887
Attachment:
tst-wordexp2.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip-compressed
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |