This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Even if the correctness is simply resistance to errors.

One doesn't have to read past this sentence to realize you don't
understand the first thing about correct programming and the people who
are supposed to do this.  Silently ignoring failures is the worst
possible way.  A programmer must be forced to correct the program and
this can only be achieved by the program going down in flames.

There is not point in further polluting this list with all this
nonsense.  Go somewhere else where you can discuss your flawed ideas of
programming.

- --
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGabUJ2ijCOnn/RHQRAohFAJ9vhlfhTLY8hb/adBXKOx9JYMKbaACgpBv4
AoJNgD/sizcWGtkWGeHZnxo=
=kw7w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]