Re: test-cancel1 failure

[Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>]

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:52:25AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> 
>> I configure on my x86-64 systems with:
>> /cvs/libc/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-add-ons --enable-kernel=2.6.16 --disable-profile 
>> 
>> And just got on two different machines this failure:
>> GCONV_PATH=/abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/iconvdata LC_ALL=C   /abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --library-path /abuild/aj/glibc/10.1:/abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/math:/abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/elf:/abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/dlfcn:/abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/nss:/abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/nis:/abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/rt:/abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/resolv:/abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/crypt:/abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/nptl /abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/nptl/tst-cancel1  > /abuild/aj/glibc/10.1/nptl/tst-cancel1.out
>> Didn't expect signal from child: got `Aborted'
>
> Does your libgcc_s.so.1 support DW_CFA_val_{offset{,_sf},expression}?
> On i?86/x86-64 for glibc 2.5 you need an unwinder (and gdb)
> that can handle those.
>
> See
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg00208.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2006-03/msg00076.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-03/msg00043.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-03/msg00009.html
>
> 	Jakub

I doubt that I have the gcc patch in my toolchain.

thanks for the info,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/
  SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature