This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hello.
I'm not sure this is the right place to ask questions. May be this is
gcc related problem. Even this may be my problem. But I hope for some
help here.
The short description of my problem is here:
printf ("Vp = %e, D = %e, %e; KD1 =%e, %e.\n", priv->Vp[0],
creal(self->D[1]), cimag(self->D[1]), creal((0.5)*KD1[1]),
cimag((0.5)*KD1[1]));
printf ("%e, %e.\n", creal(priv->Vp[0]*(self->D[1] + 0.5*KD1[1])),
cimag(priv->Vp[0]*(self->D[1] + 0.5*KD1[1])));
This are two consequent lines of my code. The output is here:
Vp = -9.756559e-02, D = 0.000000e+00, 0.000000e+00; KD1 =0.000000e+00,
0.000000e+00.
-0.000000e+00, nan.
Vp is double. KC1, KD1 are complex double...
Why nan??? :( It seems to me that this is the libc's problem with
complex numbers. If I remove cimag(...) in the second printf I receive
nan in the second line of output in place of -0.000000e+00...
Please, help me. May be you can see here something I can not?
This program is written without threads. libc-3.3.5. gentoo
distribution.
Any way. Thank you for your time,
Peter.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |