This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ASSEMBLER vs. ASSEMBLER

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Chris Zankel <zankel at tensilica dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 21:26:40 -0400
Subject: Re: __ASSEMBLER__ vs. ASSEMBLER
References: <42F3FC91.2030000@tensilica.com>

On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 04:56:01PM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am working on the Xtensa port of glibc and ran into a minor problem.
> 
> It seems that most architecture use __ASSEMBLER__ in conditional 
> sections (for example sysdep.h) but Makerule defines ASSEMBLER (without 
> the underscores):
> 
> S-CPPFLAGS = -DASSEMBLER $(asm-CPPFLAGS)
> 
> Should the line in Makerule not be like this?
> 
> S-CPPFLAGS = -D__ASSEMBLER__ $(asm-CPPFLAGS)

Your compiler ought to be defining that.  Nowadays it's in
libcpp/init.c.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

References:
- __ASSEMBLER__ vs. ASSEMBLER
  - From: Chris Zankel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: __ASSEMBLER__ vs. ASSEMBLER

Re: ASSEMBLER vs. ASSEMBLER