This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Thu, 2004-05-27 09:05:00 -0700, Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
wrote in message <40B611AC.3040907@kegel.com>:
> The error is discussed in http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14096
...and others, like my 15398 or 15395 which I hit during tests for a
vax-linux toolchain.
> which concludes that gcc is being a bit too strict about
> some inline arcana.
At least the bug I submitted it targeted for GCC 3.5, so it should be a
matter of a month or two to get fixed. This not only shows up during
cross-compilation, but also (at least on x86_64) on native compilers.
> I'm posting here in case anyone wants to light a fire under the gcc
> guys, who may not realize this affects glibc, or in case
> anyone has a workaround that placates gcc.
Since it's already a Target Milestone for 3.5.0, I think they'll fix it
soon. Fortunately, I'm not yet that far in glibc to hit this bug:)
Though, I can't really decide if gcc or glibc (and Linux kernel) is
wrong here...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak!
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |