This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Fix: Bug#205118: locales: lo_LA.UTF-8 is broken

From: <anousak at muanglao dot com>
To: "'Thorsten Kukuk'" <kukuk at suse dot de>,<libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
Cc: <205118 at bugs dot debian dot org>,"'Denis Barbier'" <barbier at debian dot org>,"'GOTO Masanori'" <gotom at debian dot or dot jp>,<bug-glibc at gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:11:22 -0400
Subject: Fix: Bug#205118: locales: lo_LA.UTF-8 is broken
Reply-to: <anousak at muanglao dot com>

Hi All,

The following is an attach file fix for duplicate definitions for lo_LA locale. Re-tested with 'localedef -f UFT-8 -I lo_LA lo_LA.UTF-8', it works fine.
 
Thanks.

Anousak Souphavanh

-----Original Message-----
From: libc-alpha-owner@sources.redhat.com [mailto:libc-alpha-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of Thorsten Kukuk
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 12:06 AM
To: libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
Subject: U0EAF duplicate in lo_LA


Hi,

locales/lo_LA has a duplicate entry for U0EAF:

locales/lo_LA:610: order for `U00000EAF' already defined at locales/lo_LA:285

Does somebody knows, what the correct one is?

  Thanks,
    Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Kukuk       http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/        kukuk@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG        Deutschherrnstr. 15-19        D-90429 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------    
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE  2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B

Attachment: lo_LA.txt
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fix: Bug#205118: locales: lo_LA.UTF-8 is broken
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

References:
- U0EAF duplicate in lo_LA
  - From: Thorsten Kukuk

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]