This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: multiple __libc_multiple_libcs error in compiling glibc 2.3.1


or this map? thanks. 

# less librt.map
GLIBC_2.1 {
  global:
    aio_cancel; aio_cancel64; aio_error; aio_error64; aio_fsync;
aio_fsync64;
    aio_init; aio_read; aio_read64; aio_return; aio_return64; aio_suspend;
    aio_suspend64; aio_write; aio_write64; lio_listio; lio_listio64;
  local:
    *;
};
GLIBC_2.2 {
  global:
    clock_getres; clock_gettime; clock_settime; clock_getcpuclockid;
    clock_nanosleep;
    shm_open; shm_unlink;
    timer_create; timer_delete; timer_getoverrun; timer_gettime;
    timer_settime;
} GLIBC_2.1;


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hu, Boris 
> Sent: 2003?1?24? 11:16
> To: 'Roland McGrath'
> Cc: Libc-Alpha (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: multiple __libc_multiple_libcs error in 
> compiling glibc 2.3.1 
> 
> 
> 
> thanks for your response. Sorry for I am a newbie to glibc. 
> Do you mean ld.map ?  I couldn't  figure out the relation 
> between __libc_multiple_libcs
> with ld.map. 
> another strange point is that I run the config without tls 
> support, however many tls functions 
> still found in ld.map???
> 
> 
> # ../configure arm-linux --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu 
> --with-headers=/arm-linux-2.4.18/include
>  --enable-add-ons --enable-shared --prefix=$PREFIX  
> --without-__thread --without-tls
> 
> 
> # less ld.map
> GLIBC_2.0 {
>   global:
>     _r_debug;
>     calloc; free; malloc; realloc; __libc_memalign;
>   local:
>     *;
> };
> GLIBC_2.1 {
>   global:
>     _dl_mcount;
> } GLIBC_2.0;
> GLIBC_2.3 {
>   global:
>     __tls_get_addr;
> } GLIBC_2.1;
> GLIBC_PRIVATE {
>   global:
>     __libc_enable_secure; __libc_stack_end;
>     _dl_argv; _dl_catch_error; _dl_check_map_versions;
>     _dl_debug_printf; _dl_debug_state; _dl_dst_count;
>     _dl_dst_substitute; _dl_init; _dl_lookup_symbol; 
> _dl_lookup_symbol_skip;
>     _dl_get_origin; _dl_tls_setup;
>     _dl_get_tls_static_info; _dl_allocate_tls_init;
>     _dl_lookup_versioned_symbol; _dl_lookup_versioned_symbol_skip;
>     _dl_map_object; _dl_map_object_deps; _dl_out_of_memory;
>     _dl_relocate_object; _dl_signal_error; _dl_start_profile; 
> _dl_starting_up;
>     _dl_unload_cache;
>     _rtld_global; _dl_tls_symaddr; _dl_allocate_tls; 
> _dl_deallocate_tls;
> } GLIBC_2.3;
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roland McGrath [mailto:roland@redhat.com]
> > Sent: 2003?1?24? 11:04
> > To: Hu, Boris
> > Cc: Libc-Alpha (E-mail)
> > Subject: Re: multiple __libc_multiple_libcs error in 
> > compiling glibc 2.3.1 
> > 
> > 
> > That kind of lossage usually happens when something you 
> didn't want is
> > getting linked into ld.so for some reason.  Look at the link 
> > map and figure
> > out what leads to bringing in suspicious objects.
> > 
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]