This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Results with glibc-2.2.92

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Jeff Chua <jchua at fedex dot com>
Cc: GNU libc <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:43:15 -0700
Subject: Re: Results with glibc-2.2.92
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208301247580.19724-100000@boston.corp.fedex.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeff Chua wrote:

So, why does the gcc/glib not default to "strip" during installation?
Most people don't bother with these files after install.

The extra size doesn't add a bit to the runtime costs. But the debug info is invaluable when you need it. If you then strip the binaries it is too late.

- -- - ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9bwX32ijCOnn/RHQRAs8nAJ0StJLPblaUerygC/bxtFR2t1OMWgCgoyrp
p8F449wWXrK33tZX8hMaxJ8=
=7dWY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Results with glibc-2.2.92
  - From: Jeff Chua

References:
- Re: Results with glibc-2.2.92
  - From: Jeff Chua

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]