This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: libc broken on all baselines.../libc/elf/librtld.os] Error 1


Matthew Bemis <bemis@iol.unh.edu> writes:

> this error is happening on many of the alpha builds that we do daily.
> this error has been happening for over a week now.

When exactly did this fail?  Do you know which patch is responsible
for this?

> this error is failing on the following libc builds:
> alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu | bootstrap-gcc_3.0.4 | libc
> alphaev67-unknown-linux-gnu | bootstrap-gcc_3.0.4 | libc
> alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu | bootstrap-gcc_2.95.3 | libc
> alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu | basic-gcc_3.0.4 | libc
> alphaev67-unknown-linux-gnu | basic-gcc_2.95.3 | libc
> alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu | basic-gcc_2.95.3 | libc
>
> all of these failed builds have the same error message
> the following is the error message from the failed build
> alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu | bootstrap-gcc_3.0.4 | libc
>
>
>
>
> buildsys/build/alpha9/bootstrap-gcc_3.0.4/native/libc/libc_pic.a -lgcc
> '-Wl,-)'
> /mnt/u9/toolchain/buildsys/build/alpha9/bootstrap-gcc_3.0.4/native/libc/libc_pic
>
> .a(brk.os): In function `brk':
> brk.os(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `__brk'

This seems to be the real problem.

> /home/toolchain/baseline/install/alpha9/bootstrap-gcc_3.0.4/native/binutils-2.11
>
> .2/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 189.

This message indicates that you should update your binutils.  CAn you
try 2.12, please?

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]