This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: ffs vs __ffs the gcc saga continues
- To: Raymond Burns <rayburns at eskimo dot com>
- Subject: Re: ffs vs __ffs the gcc saga continues
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- Date: 12 Mar 2001 11:53:09 -0800
- Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103121006440.17232-100000@coalcreekmill.cm.com>
- Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)
Raymond Burns <rayburns@eskimo.com> writes:
> My gut say's gcc is still very broken and that the glibc tree is
> relatively clean, I'm watching for changes to gcc.
ffs is a gcc builtin. If either ffsl or __ffs work and you compile
with optimization and without -fno-builtins then you should look into
gcc.
--
---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------