This is the mail archive of the
kawa@sourceware.org
mailing list for the Kawa project.
Re: new experimental "part extraction" syntax
Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:
> > Looking to the end
> > to see the result seems a lot more procedural.
>
> I don't see how it is "more procedural".
Technically it isn't. What I should have said is that it seems more
likely to create the kind of punctuation soup I end up with when doing
functional-style programming in Java.
But now that I see the *: syntax already available it doesn't matter
much to me what comes of the part extraction syntax.