This is the mail archive of the guile@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Guile project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GOOPS: New syntax for `define-method'?

To: Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj at mdj dot nada dot kth dot se>
Subject: Re: GOOPS: New syntax for `define-method'?
From: Russell McManus <russell dot mcmanus at msdw dot com>
Date: 11 Apr 2000 08:20:19 -0400
Cc: ttn at glug dot org, djurfeldt at nada dot kth dot se, guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <E12elh7-0005ab-00@mdj.nada.kth.se> <200004102337.QAA02969@revel.glug.org> <xy766tp9usk.fsf@mdj.nada.kth.se>

Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@mdj.nada.kth.se> writes:

> The question is: Which syntax is best?  Or, rather, which syntax does
> people here prefer?

I prefer CLOS similarity, when there is a low cost to this.

-russ

--
"Reality is what refuses to disappear when you stop believing in it."
             -- (VALIS, Philip K. Dick)

References:
- GOOPS: New syntax for `define-method'?
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt
- Re: GOOPS: New syntax for `define-method'?
  - From: thi
- Re: GOOPS: New syntax for `define-method'?
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]