This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GSL project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
jdwright@wesleyan.edu writes: > Dear gsl users, > Does anyone out there have experience using the > "gsl_sf_coupling_3j" routine of the "gsl_sf_coupling" package? I > wonder if the call: > gsl_sf_coupling_3j (two_ja,two_jb,two_jc,two_ma,two_mb,two_mc) > yields accurate results for large values of two_ja, two_jb, and > two_jc around 30 with two_ma=0,two_mb=0,two_mc=0. > Thanks, > J. David Wright Physics Department Wesleyan University > jdwright@wesleyan.edu The result->error term from the full version of the function gsl_sf_coupling_3j_e() should give an estimate of the error. If it's not accurate please send a bug report, thanks. The exact value could be computed to high precision using GP-PARI, which is free software. regards Brian Gough
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |