This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Breaking on C labels?

From: Jim Blandy <jimb at codesourcery dot com>
To: Michael Snyder <Michael dot Snyder at palmsource dot com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:55:57 -0800
Subject: Re: Breaking on C labels?
References: <20070125194905.GB4262@adacore.com> <m3zm86yfc1.fsf@codesourcery.com> <1169767203.22601.128.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Michael Snyder <Michael.Snyder@palmsource.com> writes:
> There's a risk that some symbol-lookup function would then select that
> label instead of the function entry label when you tried to look up the
> nearest label preceeding a given address.

This should be easy to avoid, shouldn't it?  We would only recognize
LOC_LABEL entries for breakpoints, and ignore them for lookups by
address.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Breaking on C labels?
  - From: Michael Snyder

References:
- Breaking on C labels?
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: Breaking on C labels?
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: Breaking on C labels?
  - From: Michael Snyder

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]