This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: deferred breakpoints

From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken at qnx dot com>
To: "Jason Molenda" <jmolenda at apple dot com>
Cc: <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:25:50 -0500
Subject: Re: deferred breakpoints
References: <38D95BB0-490C-11D7-83B0-003065BC3540@apple.com>

> Our developers use the future-breaks a lot here at Apple, they work
> well for the sort of problem you're looking at.

Thanks for responding Jason.  I'm curious: are these patches in use at Apple
not considered suitable for submission to the FSF?  I'm just wondering why
you maintain a separate tree rather than pushing everything out.  We're
trying hard to get all our changes rolled in to avoid the hassle of having a
separate tree.

cheers,

Kris

Follow-Ups:
- gdb detach
  - From: Smita
- Re: deferred breakpoints
  - From: Jason Molenda

References:
- Re: deferred breakpoints
  - From: Jason Molenda

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]