This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:20:30 -0400
Subject: Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
References: <3D938E6F.6090809@redhat.com> <2427-Fri27Sep2002201112+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>

Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:47:11 -0400
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>

I'd like to float the idea of moving all the generic dummy frame code into a new file dummy.[hc].
Yes, but I'd suggest to call the files something other than dummy.*,
lest someone thinks they are junk ;-)

But then I can't have a function called ``dummy_spit()'' (OZ? expression for blowing one's fuse).

More seriously, I'm struggling for a better name: ``generic'' ``gdf'' ``dummy-frame'', ... I guess the last one?

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]