This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Make tracepoints into breakpoints
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Stan Shebs <stan at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:54:21 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make tracepoints into breakpoints
- References: <49CD275B.1020003@codesourcery.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:22:03 -0700
> From: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
>
> doc/
> * gdb.texinfo (Tracepoints): Describe tracepoints as a
> special case of breakpoints.
> (Enable and Disable Tracepoints): Mention deprecation.
> (Listing Tracepoints): Update description and example.
Thanks. I have comments about this part:
> Before running such a @dfn{trace experiment}, an arbitrary number of
> ! tracepoints can be set. A tracepoint is actually a special type of
> ! breakpoint (@pxref{Set Breaks}), so you can manipulate it using
> ! standard breakpoint commands. For instance, as with breakpoints,
^^
You have numerous places with only one space between sentences.
> The @code{trace} command is very similar to the @code{break} command.
> ! Its argument @var{location} can be a source line, a function name, or
> ! an address in the target program. @xref{Set Breaks}. The
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Please change this cross-reference to point to "Specify Location".
> ! In addition to the basic info common to all types of breakpoints,
> ! tracepoint listings may include a step count, a pass count, and the
> ! list of actions.
In this new text, you have removed the references to the tracepoint
parameters that affect the step count, the passcount, and the actions.
I think we should not drop those references, because they go a long
way towards explaining what these parameters are.
> The action lines are prefixed with an @code{A} so
Please use @samp{A} here, not @code{A}. "A" is not a symbol, so it
should be quoted (in the printed output).
Other than that, the doco part of the patch is OK.