This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1 [Re: [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays]

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:52:56 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1 [Re: [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays]
References: <20080818111120.GE16894@adacore.com> <200808181553.m7IFrG3w005270@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <48A59B3C.9050801@net-b.de> <20080818111120.GE16894@adacore.com> <20080907115637.GA12939@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <m38wu2psd4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20080908172701.GA18549@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20080919222852.GB23372@adacore.com> <m31vz6v7dv.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

> Joel> (that was my windy way of saying: I think I agree)
> 
> I think it would be a good idea provided that there's some data
> indicating that the space savings is worthwhile.  I'm not sure what
> would qualify here.

I actually wasn't thinking about space savings, just code clarity.
If we can save space too, great. But I think the first goal in itself
is worthwhile.

-- 
Joel

References:
- [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1 [Re: [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1 [Re: [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays]
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1 [Re: [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1 [Re: [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays]
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1 [Re: [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays]
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]