This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Use bfd_vma for bfd addresses.

From: Thiemo Seufer <ths at networkno dot de>
To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 17:23:14 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use bfd_vma for bfd addresses.
References: <20061107131722.GC19541@networkno.de> <20061107150240.GA16014@nevyn.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 01:17:22PM +0000, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > 
> > the appended patch uses bfd_vma instead of SIM_ADDR for bfd addresses.
> > This prevents breaking the sign extension of addresses on mips.
> > 
> > Ok to apply?
> 
> What's the difference - is SIM_ADDR 32-bit?

Yes.

> A test case for this would be nice if there isn't one already.

I'll see what I can come up with.


Thiemo

References:
- [PATCH] Use bfd_vma for bfd addresses.
  - From: Thiemo Seufer
- Re: [PATCH] Use bfd_vma for bfd addresses.
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]