This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning

From: Jim Blandy <jimb at red-bean dot com>
To: Randolph Chung <randolph at tausq dot org>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 19:18:24 -0800
Subject: Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
References: <20051109203108.GX1635@adacore.com> <43735815.3070805@tausq.org> <20051111001017.GJ1635@adacore.com> <437548AF.5090107@tausq.org> <8f2776cb0511111838m64d478d9s2e04db338fbf7fc8@mail.gmail.com>

Just to be clear, though --- I think Dwarf CFI is preferable to
prologue analysis.  Even if we can do a decent job recovering
unwinding data, the compiler actually *knows* it, and ought to just
tell us.

References:
- [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
  - From: Randolph Chung
- Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
  - From: Randolph Chung
- Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning
  - From: Jim Blandy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]