This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Blush... Obvious mistake ...
I looked at the 18 failures I currently have when running the following
testcase (not yet approved):
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-05/msg00546.html
It turns out it was an obvious confusion between the register number
embedded in the instruction, and hte register number as GDB knows it.
Say for instance we have a conditional branch instruction on f16, right
now we read register number 16, which is register a0, not f16! The fix
I just committed seemed to be improving things, but only by chance :-/.
With the attached patch, all tests now PASS.
2005-05-26 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
* alpha-tdep.c (alpha_next_pc): Use correct register number
for floating-point branch instructions.
Tested on alpha-tru64 5.1a. No regression, fixes all 18 failures
observed in alpha-step.exp.
OK to apply?
--
Joel
Attachment:
alpha-tdep.c.diff
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |