This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rfa/testsuite] Signals vs handler entry-point

From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
To: Michael Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:43:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] Signals vs handler entry-point
References: <41336710.2050801@gnu.org> <41336C91.nailNDE1UBEQ0@mindspring.com>

Looks okay to me.

This patch is approved, with a 24-hour delay for anyone else
to object or ask for more time.

===

2004-08-30 Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>

	* gdb.base/sigstep.exp (breakpoint_to_handler_entry)
	(skip_to_handler_entry): New procedures.  Test stepping into a
	handler when the breakpoint is at the handler's entry point.

It's now in.

Andrew

References:
- [rfa/testsuite] Signals vs handler entry-point
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [rfa/testsuite] Signals vs handler entry-point
  - From: Michael Chastain

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]