This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
I must say I am really non-plussed by indent. I committed the attached
patch to fix the formatting where it was the most horrible and unreadable.
I did it in a way that indent would then keep the formatting as is, so
subsequent runs of gdb_indent.sh should not revert the current layout to
the ugly one.
There are other instances where Paul and I agree that the new formatting
is not as good as the previous one. For instance:
@@ -9957,10 +9962,7 @@ struct type **const (ada_builtin_types[]
&builtin_type_unsigned_long,
&builtin_type_unsigned_long_long,
&builtin_type_long_double,
- &builtin_type_complex,
- &builtin_type_double_complex,
- 0
-};
+ &builtin_type_complex, &builtin_type_double_complex, 0};
where it decided to join the last 3 lines, or
@@ -3974,8 +4010,7 @@ ada_make_symbol_completion_list (const c
for (psym = objfile->global_psymbols.list + ps->globals_offset;
psym < (objfile->global_psymbols.list + ps->globals_offset
- + ps->n_global_syms);
- psym++)
+ + ps->n_global_syms); psym++)
I guess we'll have to live with this...
2004-06-28 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
* ada-lang.c: Re-indent file, with some massaging to help indent
a bit when the result is otherwise really too ugly.
--
Joel
Attachment:
ada-lang.c.diff
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |