This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Multiplexed registers and invalidating the register cache

Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:41:49 -0400
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>


> +The target's register contents has changed. 


FYI, this should probably read:
	The target's memory or register contents have [has?] changed.
eli?


I'm not sure; what is the difference between the two wordings?

"have" sounds right (...), hmm. Check dictionary ``/has/ 3rd person _singular_, present of /have/'' [canadian oxford] so "have" is correct.

Andrew


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]