Re: [RFA]: Test for PR/1236

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>]

> +#
> +# Break on multiply defined method (PR objc/1236)
> +#
> +set name "break on non-debuggable method"
> +send_gdb "break someMethod\n"
> +gdb_expect {
> +    -re "\\\[0\\\] cancel.*\\\[1\\\] all.*\\\[2\\\]\[ \]+-.NonDebug someMethod.*\\\[3\\\]\[ \]+-.NonDebug2 someMethod.*" {
> +	send_gdb "2\n"
> +	exp_continue
> +    }
> +    -re "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ at 0x\[0-9a-f\]+.*" { pass $name }
> +    -re ".*$gdb_prompt $"   { fail $name }
> +    timeout                 { fail "$name (timeout)" }
> +}

David, Daniel, does exp_continue work with gdb_test_multiple?
Adam, if it does, it's a better alternative (as I learn't not two days 
ago :-).

Anyway, use:
	kfail gdb/1236 "$name"
for the known fail path.  Otherwize, feel free to commit the more the 
better :-)

Andrew


> Index: testsuite/gdb.objc/nondebug.m
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: testsuite/gdb.objc/nondebug.m
> diff -N testsuite/gdb.objc/nondebug.m
> --- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> +++ testsuite/gdb.objc/nondebug.m	14 Nov 2003 03:46:27 -0000
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +#include <objc/Object.h>
> +
> +@interface NonDebug: Object
> +{
> +}
> +@end
> +@interface NonDebug2: Object
> +{
> +}
> +@end
> +
> +@implementation NonDebug
> +
> +- someMethod
> +{
> +  printf("method someMethod\n");
> +  return self;
> +}
> +
> +@end
> +@implementation NonDebug2
> +
> +- someMethod
> +{
> +  printf("method2 someMethod\n");
> +  return self;
> +}
> +
> +@end
> +
> +
> +int main (int argc, const char *argv[])
> +{
> +  id obj;
> +  obj = [NonDebug new];
> +  [obj someMethod];
> +  return 0;
> +}