This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses

From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
To: David Carlton <carlton at kealia dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:35:13 +0200
Subject: Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
References: <3FC119EB.1060102@gnu.org> <ufzgee29u.fsf@elta.co.il> <3FC234C0.1000500@gnu.org> <20031124165047.GA2227@nevyn.them.org> <yf2r7zxzlu4.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>

> From: David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:02:27 -0800
> 
> I'm not sure that STREQ meets the second criterion - frequent
> contributors are good about not adding new uses of it.

We have ARI for that: even if new contributions escape Andrew's
and Elena's hawkish eyes and use STREQ, ARI will flag them.

References:
- [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
  - From: David Carlton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]