This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch/5.3] No FUNCTION

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 12:46:14 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch/5.3] No __FUNCTION__
References: <3D971F0C.2090807@redhat.com>

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 11:41:00AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> I've committed the attached (with a hesatant ok from MarkK) (HEAD and 
> branch).
> 
> What GDB needs is something that works regardless of the compiler.
> 
> Andrew

Where is this usage of __FUNCTION__ not portable?  Concatenating it
with things, now there's a problem; but I don't remember any compiler
that couldn't handle function(__FUNCTION__).

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch/5.3] No __FUNCTION__
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- [patch/5.3] No __FUNCTION__
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patch/5.3] No __FUNCTION__

Re: [patch/5.3] No FUNCTION