This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] memattr bounds


On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> > The following addresses edge conditions in the mem command by making a
> > special case for upper bound == 0.  When the upper bound is zero, it is
> > assumed that the user wants an upper bound of max CORE_ADDR+1. Currently,
> > it's not possible to define a memory region with zero as it's upper bound, 
> > so this should not conflict with any current usage.
> 

I've committed the memattr.c changes, with the requested tweaks.

Is the doco descriptive enough?  I'm trying to be brief without being
terse...


2002-06-24  Don Howard  <dhoward@redhat.com>

        * memattr.c (create_mem_region): Treat hi == 0 as a special case
        that means max CORE_ADDR+1.
        (lookup_mem_region): Ditto.
        (mem_info_command): Ditto.



Index: memattr.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/memattr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -p -u -w -r1.11 memattr.c
--- memattr.c	12 May 2002 04:20:05 -0000	1.11
+++ memattr.c	24 Jun 2002 21:58:54 -0000
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ create_mem_region (CORE_ADDR lo, CORE_AD
   struct mem_region *n, *new;
 
   /* lo == hi is a useless empty region */
-  if (lo >= hi)
+  if (lo >= hi && hi != 0)
     {
       printf_unfiltered ("invalid memory region: low >= high\n");
       return NULL;
@@ -57,8 +57,9 @@ create_mem_region (CORE_ADDR lo, CORE_AD
   while (n)
     {
       /* overlapping node */
-      if ((lo >= n->lo && lo < n->hi) ||
-	  (hi > n->lo && hi <= n->hi))
+      if ((lo >= n->lo && (lo < n->hi || n->hi == 0)) 
+	  || (hi > n->lo && (hi <= n->hi || n->hi == 0))
+	  || (lo <= n->lo && (hi >= n->hi || hi == 0)))
 	{
 	  printf_unfiltered ("overlapping memory region\n");
 	  return NULL;
@@ -111,7 +112,7 @@ lookup_mem_region (CORE_ADDR addr)
     {
       if (m->enabled_p == 1)
 	{
-	  if (addr >= m->lo && addr < m->hi)
+	  if (addr >= m->lo && (addr < m->hi || m->hi == 0))
 	    return m;
 
 	  if (addr >= m->hi && lo < m->hi)
@@ -234,6 +235,7 @@ mem_info_command (char *args, int from_t
 
   for (m = mem_region_chain; m; m = m->next)
     {
+      CORE_ADDR hi;
       char *tmp;
       printf_filtered ("%-3d %-3c\t",
 		       m->number,
@@ -244,11 +246,12 @@ mem_info_command (char *args, int from_t
 	tmp = local_hex_string_custom ((unsigned long) m->lo, "016l");
       
       printf_filtered ("%s ", tmp);
+      hi = (m->hi == 0 ? ~0 : m->hi);
       
       if (TARGET_ADDR_BIT <= 32)
-	tmp = local_hex_string_custom ((unsigned long) m->hi, "08l");
+	tmp = local_hex_string_custom ((unsigned long) hi, "08l");
       else
-	tmp = local_hex_string_custom ((unsigned long) m->hi, "016l");
+	tmp = local_hex_string_custom ((unsigned long) hi, "016l");
       
       printf_filtered ("%s ", tmp);
 
Index: doc/gdb.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.102
diff -p -u -w -r1.102 gdb.texinfo
--- doc/gdb.texinfo	11 Jun 2002 20:36:57 -0000	1.102
+++ doc/gdb.texinfo	24 Jun 2002 21:59:06 -0000
@@ -5601,9 +5601,10 @@ to enable, disable, or remove a memory r
 
 @table @code
 @kindex mem
-@item mem @var{address1} @var{address2} @var{attributes}@dots{}
-Define memory region bounded by @var{address1} and @var{address2}
-with attributes @var{attributes}@dots{}.
+@item mem @var{lower} @var{upper} @var{attributes}@dots{}
+Define memory region bounded by @var{lower} and @var{upper} with
+attributes @var{attributes}@dots{}.  Note that @var{upper} == 0 is a
+special case: it indicates the max memory address.
 
 @kindex delete mem
 @item delete mem @var{nums}@dots{}


-- 
dhoward@redhat.com
gdb engineering






Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]