This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [hjl@lucon.org: Re: Does gdb 5.2 work with statically linked thread application under Linux?]

From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:54:15 -0800
Subject: Re: [hjl@lucon.org: Re: Does gdb 5.2 work with statically linked thread application under Linux?]
References: <20020313125034.B14483@nevyn.them.org>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:50:34PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Does anyone have a comment on this patch?  It fixes thread_db for
> statically linked binaries (which I broke), and I think it's
> legitimate.
> 

I am enclosing an upated patch here. Any targets should be able to
use target_corefile_hook if necessary.

H.J.
---

Attachment: gdb-static.patch
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [hjl@lucon.org: Re: Does gdb 5.2 work with statically linked thread application under Linux?]
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- [hjl@lucon.org: Re: Does gdb 5.2 work with statically linked thread application under Linux?]
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]