This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch

To: Michael Snyder <msnyder at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:50:58 -0500
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at redhat dot com>, Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <200102210135.RAA21426@bosch.cygnus.com> <x7itm466ta.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu> <3A940B9C.696ACE7B@cygnus.com> <x7n1bfvje1.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu> <3A9431C0.6E23A2E6@cygnus.com> <3A944CEB.2EDE2369@cygnus.com>

Michael Snyder wrote:

> Actually, I thought that the practice was only done selectively.
> I don't see its usefulness, except for headers that might have
> different names for different configurations.

It does two things - handles include files with possibly different paths
(the SRCDIR that dan noticed); makes the include spaghetti mess easier
to manage (defs_h expands to all the files it includes, similarly for
others).

Given automake makes it all go a way it isn't really an issue.

	Andrew

References:
- Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
  - From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
  - From: Michael Snyder

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]