This is the mail archive of the frysk@sourceware.org mailing list for the frysk project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: frysk-core/frysk/proc ChangeLog IsaIA32.java I ...


Andrew Cagney wrote:
Mark,

These changes affect three people directly: me, you and phil. Phil and I want this; and for you, it is cosmetic. Why are you so resistant to what you yourself recognize has no effect on the code you work on?

I've been caught up in deliverables so I have not been really paying attention to this thread, perhaps as much as I should have. Apologies for that. I think there are several issues caught up here, and they are getting confused as one.


First I do not care about what the name is. It's not important to me. dead and live, proc and corefile, pink or blue, vanilla or strawberry it is something that is fluid and can change now and in the future. That can be taken as complicit agreement of disagreement. I just don't have strong feelings here.

However, I think the larger picture here, and I think is lost in the "change over discussion" trend, is that the current proc model is pretty faulty in some of its assumptions and really needs refactoring. For the last six months I've been working on tweaking this and that so that Proc/Task/Host is not live process specific. So in the longer to mid term there really needs to be a rethink of that model.. Right now, Andrew, Mark and myself are the main people twiddling the bits here, I think we all have our own strong ideas on how this should work. I think this thread has spawned because these ideas are not reconciled. In the debate of this thread, and myself just ignoring it for various reasons, I think there is a plain and clear need for a roundtable I'd hazard a guess we agree more than we disagree, and it just needs to be thrashed out. However we all have our deadlines, and for one reason or another this design discussion has slipped through the cracks, and people have moved forward with their ideas. I'm also guilty of not discussing a lot of my changes.

We should table a discussion on the whys and the why nots soon.

Regards

Phil




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]