Re: proc based observers

[Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal at redhat dot com>]

> > The history behind this is interesting:
> >
> > We used to have some proc observers, but we wanted fine grain control so 
> > everything was moved down to tasks. then we wanted a safe way of getting 
> > a procs tasks, so we created ProcTasksObserver.
> >     
>
> Is there any functional difference between the old and the new way?
>   
Do you mean the old and new way of getting tasks ?

If so, the old way of getting tasks was Proc.getTask(). Problem is while 
you are iterating over that list tasks could be dying and getting created