Re: frysk.proc.{ptrace,corefile} -> frysk.proc.{live,dead}

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at redhat dot com>]

Mark Wielaard wrote:
> We can certainly refactor the proc interfaces and implementation
> subpackages. But you are mixing two things in your plan. The renaming of
> existing packages and classes (which I don't see any benefit of) and
> exposing flaws in of the refactoring of the proc, proc.ptrace and
> proc.core code because there is a clear separation between interface and
> implementation.
>   

Sorry, I don't follow, what do you think I am planning, and why do you 
think it is mixed?

Andrew