This is the mail archive of the
frysk@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the frysk project.
Re: Preliminary DOM Doc
- From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at redhat dot com>
- To: Rick Moseley <rmoseley at redhat dot com>
- Cc: frysk <frysk at sources dot redhat dot com>, Mike Behm <mbehm at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:10:15 -0500
- Subject: Re: Preliminary DOM Doc
- References: <44241493.4050307@redhat.com>
Rick, nice!
Since this is describing internals, and since we're using javadoc/gjdoc,
this can be added to:
frysk-core/frysk/dom/package.html
and the corresponding .java files making it an integral part of our
programmer documentation. For reference the current frysk.doc page is
here:
http://sourceware.org/frysk/javadoc/public/frysk/dom/package-summary.html
Images are possible, see the frysk.proc directory.
We also need to get away from using the overloaded DOM term (i.e.,
frysk.dom) :-) DOM is either Domain Object Model (how I use it) and
Document Object Model (how w3c uses it). Talking with Adam, one
possible package name would be frysk.source (sounds good, doesn't mean
anything :-). Any thoughts there?
One thing I'm not clear on is the relationship between the run-time
representation (based on debug info) and the source code
representation. Perhaps that can be mentioned.
If you've got questions bug me here or IRC (I'll be off line until Monday).
Andrew