This is the mail archive of the
frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
mailing list for the frysk project.
[Bug general/3784] New: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
- From: "cagney at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
- Date: 22 Dec 2006 15:32:41 -0000
- Subject: [Bug general/3784] New: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
dejagnu has the advantage of working well with serial I/O programs (due to
expect) but the disadvantage of being yet another testing framework to learn and
the test model isn't very consistent when compared to JUnit.
PyUnit has the advantage of being shared with dogtail's test framework, being
similar to JUnit in its approach, but being an unknown when it comes to handling
serial I/O (and some people dislike python more then tcl :-)
How good is PyUnit at handling seerial I/O?
--
Summary: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
Product: frysk
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: general
AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3784
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.