This is the mail archive of the ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: fix for arm target.ld

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew dot lunn at ascom dot ch>
To: Robin Farine <robin dot farine at acn-group dot ch>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter at redhat dot com>, eCos patches ml <ecos-patches at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 17:16:33 +0200
Subject: Re: fix for arm target.ld
References: <1030438172.9208.18.camel@halftrack> <1030445623.6721.3.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> <1030457266.440.33.camel@halftrack> <1030459341.587.60.camel@halftrack> <200208271500.g7RF0vk10509@deneb.localdomain> <1030460933.587.66.camel@halftrack>

> Ah now I see, gcc-3.x doesn't define "arm" (still using gcc-2.95 here).

And gcc-2.95 is still the "supported" compiler for arm, not gcc 3.x.

Does the section have to be called .note.arm.ident? Can it have
another name without arm in it?

        Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fix for arm target.ld
  - From: Mark Salter

References:
- fix for arm target.ld
  - From: Robin Farine
- Re: fix for arm target.ld
  - From: Gary Thomas
- Re: fix for arm target.ld
  - From: Robin Farine
- Re: fix for arm target.ld
  - From: Lucky Luck
- Re: fix for arm target.ld
  - From: Mark Salter
- Re: fix for arm target.ld
  - From: Robin Farine

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]