This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: mistake: off_t should be signed
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot com>
- To: Donnat Eric <e dot donnat at ri dot silicomp dot fr>
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 21:52:58 +0000
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] mistake: off_t should be signed
- Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd.
- References: <3C449F86.50772275@ri.silicomp.fr>
Donnat Eric wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I found what looks like a mistake in the definition of off_t in
> <sys/types.h> : POSIX says (paragraph 2.5) that it should be a "signed
> arithmetic type", but I found that eCos defines it as unsigned.
>
> Feel free to correct it. ;-)
Done! Well spotted. Thanks,
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine