This is the mail archive of the eclipse@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the gcj-compiled eclipse project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: cannot build from srpm.

From: Marcos Dione <mdione at grulic dot org dot ar>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: eclipse at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:13:56 -0300
Subject: Re: cannot build from srpm.
References: <20030812115856.GD2137@sexy> <8765l2yik1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20030812133643.GE2137@sexy> <87smo6x2nu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 10:26:45AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Marcos" == Marcos Dione <mdione@grulic.org.ar> writes:
> What's important isn't the ssa-ness of the compiler, but rather that
> the patches we added to gcj for eclipse are only available in this
> RPM.
> 
> I believe all the required ant patches are in rhug.
> http://sources.redhat.com/rhug/

    'ant' patches? isn't gcj the patched one? or are both? I downloaded
the srpm's (for ant and gcc-ssa) and I don't see anything big done to
ant, but I see several patches (which I don't understand as I'm not
familiar to gcj). hmmm, may be it's too big the changes to port it to
debian :(

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cannot build from srpm.
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: cannot build from srpm.
  - From: Jan Schulz

References:
- cannot build from srpm.
  - From: Marcos Dione
- Re: cannot build from srpm.
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: cannot build from srpm.
  - From: Marcos Dione
- Re: cannot build from srpm.
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]