This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: [docbook] Software Review: InDesign + DocBook
- From: Rene Hache <rene dot hache at gmail dot com>
- To: David White <davidw at kencook dot com>
- Cc: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:58:50 -0700
- Subject: Re: [docbook] Software Review: InDesign + DocBook
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IMjDgNHBfWCGt9cVTifzxrZFu/jTGvQXdhvtpFLkWSNybwd4S6AP8vC6D4sEjQeOjMIZS4V9wUanMrwF9CBx+bxNK7f1Hmvf/0vm7T9V25ypSVHRBHbjx0dlAAq48MAL0NeFR8MP7C9X4i7p+hS4fE0z9T3tl2juWO3cyKTi62Y=
- References: <4267E7CF.8050904@kencook.com>
- Reply-to: Rene Hache <rene dot hache at gmail dot com>
One major problem is that using InDesign with XML is definitely less
than intuitive. How this may be different with InCopy I don't know.
InDesign CS also doesn't support XML tables, although InDesign CS2 is
supposed to. How this will be implemented remains to be seen.
As a desktop publisher I use InDesign CS for about 80% of my work and
I use DocBook for other personal projects. However, I would not, at
this point in time, even entertain a Docbook/InDesign solution. It's
just not there yet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-help@lists.oasis-open.org