This is the mail archive of the
docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the docbook-tools project.
Re: ANNOUNCE Support for XML
Le Lundi 13 Novembre 2000 07:08, Gregory Leblanc a écrit :
> > In the Makefile, you have the following:
> > ...
> > htmldir = $(docdir)/html/docbook-utils-0.6
> > ...
> > install-htmlDATA: $(html_DATA)
> > ...
> > $(mkinstalldirs) $(DESTDIR)$(htmldir)
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^
> > so the buildrooting is done outside of the "docdir" variable by autoconf
> > default behaviour.
>
> I don't really see how this works, but I'm not an auto* expert (yet).
Assume it is braindead. Did it? Okay, you did half of the way... ;-)
> > I know this is not logical, but I'm not responsible for that.
>
> Do you mean to say that I can't blame my autoconf problems on you? :)
You haven't autoconf problems. Everyone has a problem with autoconf.
;-)
> > I encourage you to give a try at building once agin the package to check
> > what I'm saying.
>
> I know that this can be fixed somehow, as there are countless other
> packages that work.
It hasn't to be fixed, because it is not a problem. The only problem is that
when you read the specfile it looks strange that mandir and docdir behave
differently.
> In it's current form, I am NOT able to build an
> RPM for the docbook-utils package unless I'm logged in as root.
???? What happens? Should not be needed.
> The
> RPM guru's say that the only packages that you MUST be root to build are
> the kernel packages, because root access is required to create the DEV
> entries. If you want info on building RPMs as non-root, let me know as
> I've got a short article on that. I'll post a message to the RPM-list
> tomorrow to see if they can help out. Thanks, Greg
No it should not be necessary. First tell me what's wrong with docbook-utils.
--
Éric Bischoff - Documentation and Localization
Caldera (Deutschland) GmbH - Linux for eBusiness
Tel: +49 9131 7192 300 - Fax: +49 9131 7192 399
http://www.caldera.de/