This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:57:44AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Norman Vine wrote:
> > Michael Hudson writes:
> > >FWIW, and I don't know how much that is, all tests pass if I link _socket
> > >statically. Oh, and this is building without threads, it seems. I'll do
> > >a new build with threads and see if anything changes, but I doubt it.
> >
> > GREAT IDEA !
> >
> > I just rebuilt python 2.1.1 with threads and linking _socket statically
> > and all seems to work :-)
> >
> > [snip]
>
> I just tried the above and it works. However, it only works if one has
> not fiddled around with rebasing their DLLs.
>
> Although this is a good short-term workaround (and the one that I will
> probably use when I release Python 2.2), I think that we should focus
> our efforts on trying to solve this problem at its root cause -- Cygwin
> fork() and DLL base address conflicts. Otherwise, when something else
> changes we will be back in the same situation.
I believe that I have found a rebase solution to the Cygwin fork()
problem that has been causing Cygwin Python some grief lately. I added
an offset option to the attached rebase tool. If I spread the DLLs out
by an extra 0x10000, then the fork() problem seems to be mitigate.
The following is the command line necessary to build rebase:
$ g++ -O2 -o rebase rebase.cc -limagehlp
After rebasing the necessary Cygwin DLLs:
$ cd /usr/bin
$ rebase -d -b 0x68000000 -o 0x10000 cygXpm-X4.dll cygXpm-noX4.dll \
cygbz21.0.dll cygcrypto.dll cygform5.dll cygform6.dll \
cyggdbm.dll cyghistory4.dll cyghistory5.dll cygintl.dll \
cygitcl30.dll cygitk30.dll cygjbig1.dll cygjpeg6b.dll cygmenu5.dll \
cygmenu6.dll cygncurses++5.dll cygncurses++6.dll cygncurses5.dll \
cygncurses6.dll cygpanel5.dll cygpanel6.dll cygpcre.dll \
cygpcreposix.dll cygpng2.dll cygreadline4.dll cygreadline5.dll \
cygregex.dll cygssl.dll cygtcl80.dll cygtclreg80.dll cygtiff3.dll \
cygtk80.dll cygz.dll
I am able to build Python *without* the following patch:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=491107&group_id=5470&atid=305470
After rebasing the necessary Cygwin and Python DLLs:
$ cd /usr/bin
$ rebase -d -b 0x68000000 -o 0x10000 cygXpm-X4.dll cygXpm-noX4.dll \
cygbz21.0.dll cygcrypto.dll cygform5.dll cygform6.dll \
cyggdbm.dll cyghistory4.dll cyghistory5.dll cygintl.dll \
cygitcl30.dll cygitk30.dll cygjbig1.dll cygjpeg6b.dll cygmenu5.dll \
cygmenu6.dll cygncurses++5.dll cygncurses++6.dll cygncurses5.dll \
cygncurses6.dll cygpanel5.dll cygpanel6.dll cygpcre.dll \
cygpcreposix.dll cygpng2.dll cygreadline4.dll cygreadline5.dll \
cygregex.dll cygssl.dll cygtcl80.dll cygtclreg80.dll cygtiff3.dll \
cygtk80.dll cygz.dll ~/src/PythonCvs/nothreads/libpython2.2.dll \
~/src/PythonCvs/nothreads/build/lib.cygwin-1.3.6-i686-2.2/*.dll
I can run the full regression test without any failures *even though*
_socket is a shared module.
I encourage those interested in Cygwin Python to determine whether or not
the above rebase solution works for them too. I'm particular interested
in 9x/Me reports since I do not have access to those platforms. Please
post your results to the Cygwin and Python mailing lists.
If my findings are corroborated, then I will work with the Cygwin team
to integrate rebase into setup.exe so that rebasing automatically occurs
every time that setup.exe is run.
Thanks,
Jason
Attachment:
rebase.cc
Description: Text document
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |